Marital Distress among Police Personnel in Awka Metropolis: The Influence of Argument and Self-efficacy
Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences,
The study investigated whether argument and self-efficacy would have an influence on marital distress among police personnel. A total number of one hundred and ninety-seven (197), Nigeria police force (NPF) personnel working in Police headquarters; served as participants for the study. They were selected using non-probability sampling (convenient sampling techniques). They consist of 87(44.2%) females and 110 (58.5%) males; their age ranged from 22-51 years and their mean age was 34.94 with standard deviation of 6.96. Three instruments were used namely: Marital Stress Inventory, Argumentativeness Scale and General Self-Efficacy Scale. Two by Two Factorial design was adopted. Two Way Analysis of Variance statistics was used to analyze the data. Two hypotheses were tested: the result indicated that hypothesis one which stated that there will be a significant difference between those with positive argument and those with negative argument on marital distress among police personnel and hypothesis two which stated that there will be a significant difference between those with positive self-efficacy and those with negative self-efficacy on marital distress among police personnel were both not accepted at p>.05. Therefore, the study recommended that counselling/marital psychologist should intensify their efforts to organize seminars/conferences on the implications of these factors (argument and self-efficacy) on marital distress among police personnel.
- marital distress and police personnel.
How to Cite
Ankerberg J, Weldon J, Burroughs D. Marriages in distress. How can you make your marriage a success? The watch tower magazine (July edition). Pennsylvania: The Watch Tower and Tract Society; 2008.
Wasson N. How to keep Hope Alive during a Marriage Crisis; 2010.
Available:http://www.savemvmarriage. com/articfes/rnanagemenldownloaded29/1 1/2010
Sanford K. Communication during marital conflict: When couples alter their appraisal, they change their behaviour. Journal of Family Psychology. 2006;20:256–265.
Pathan ZA. Adversities of marital conflict: A sociological analysis. Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2015; 20(2):19-25.
Tobin M. Marital crisis; time does not heal all wounds. New York: The United States Journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS); 2004.
Edger D. What will make marriage work. Family marital relationships. In Sper, D. (Ed) Radio bible class. Michigan: Grand rapids incorporation. How to stop your marriage from falling into Divorce; 2010. Available:http://www.avemymarriaqe. Comdownioaded 21/11/2010
How to take care of financial management problem in your marriage
Collins H. Collins English Dictionary (13th edition); 2018.
Canary DJ, Cupach WR, Messman SJ. Relationship conflict: Conflict in parent-child, friendship, and romantic relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
Bradbury TN, Fincham FD. A contextual model for advancing the study of marital interaction. In G. J. O. Fletcher & Fincham FD (Eds.), cognition in close relationships Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1991;127-147.
Cherlin AJ. The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2004;66(4):848−861.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. 1997; 102.
Arias I, Lyons CM, Street AE. Individual and marital consequences of victimization: Moderating effects of relationship efficacy and spouse support. Journal of Family Violence. 1997;12(2):193-210.
Riggio HR, Weiser DA, Valenzuela A, Lui P, Montes R, Heuer J. Initial validation of a measure of self-efficacy in romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;51:601–606.
Stuart RB. Operant-interpersonal treatment for marital discord. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2009;33:675–682.
Pajares F. Inviting self–efficacy: The role of invitation in the development of confidence and competence in writing. 2002;31:13.
Ainsworth MDS, Bowlby J. An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist. 1991;46:331-341.
Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Attachment. New York: Basic Books. 1991; 1.
Hazan C, Shaver PR. Romantic love conceptualised as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;52(3):511-524.
Omoluabi PF. Psychosocial causes and remedies of single parenthoood. Paper presented at the first manual APQUEN conference, Enugu; 1994.
Infante DA, Rancer AS. A conceptualiza-tion and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1982;46:72-80.
Omoluabi PF. Standardization of three communication inventories with Nigerian Samples. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Lagos; 1999.
Locke HJ, Sabaght F, Thomes MM. Communication and adjustment in marriage. Family Process. 1967;6:173-184.
Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, UK: Nfer-Nelson.1995; 35-37
Van der Lippe T, Voorpostel M, Hewitt B. Disagreements among cohabiting and married couples in 22 European countries. Demographic Research. 2014;31:247–273.
Burgoon JK. Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1993;12:30-48.
Sahebihagh MH, Khorshidi Z, Atri SB, Jafarabadi MA. Investigating the relationship between self-efficacy and emotional divorce among nurses in the city of Rasht, Iran (2015). Annual Tropical Medicine Public Health. 2017;10:1596- 600.
Abstract View: 1555 times
PDF Download: 815 times